Command System vs Market System

The Market System is any systematic process that enables marketers to bid and interact with sellers to make deals without any authority putting a pause on any transactions. Anyone can be regularly involved in the market system. The freedom to roam allows Inequality within the system, you have the elite and you have the lower half. This generates free competition for citizens, businesses, firms, and other industries, the competitiveness gains assets for the governmental economy. More so, the government sponsors events that involve the market system, so to benefit from his is Just what the economic system needs to be successful.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The united States is the champion of the market system; this is the only country that successfully makes this idea work. The individual Innovation is what this country symbolizes, the free ability to accomplish personal desires and flannel growth. The system achieves from the peoples’ actions as well. When a new product Is created, It usually starts out at a high price, once it is in the market for a period of time, and other companies begin to copy it. This makes the price go down as new products emerge that are similar.

In a competitive market, the poor versions of the product or the overpriced will be pushed out of the market because consumers will reject them, making it a success for the marketers In the middle. The Command System Is where the government determines the goods that should be produced, how much should be produced and the price at which the goods will be offered for sale. This is very different from the market system of the U. S. Two countries that are known for the command system, North Korea and China, are controlled completely by the authority. The benefit of this system is the minimization f utilizing resources.

Instead of Individuals being rewarded for the achievements of successful products, the authority and government will receive the honors. The distribution of the earned wealth Is spread among all people, meaning there are no inequalities to be concerned about. Although, the spreading of wealth benefits all, there is a lack of innovation. The consumer demands won’t be satisfied in this system by the production. Unlike the free market, the command has a lack of efficiency and the product is of poor quality. If there were any natural changes of the products on he market, the government wouldn’t be able to react fast enough to make positive gains.

Surplus also can be a problem, materials are wasted, and so Is labor. The there will be a continuous utilization of the resources available. The system does not suffer from the movements of business cycles, and it demands that the economy matures in a steady way. Also, infrastructure investing for the long term is often thought of without any fear of losing a venture. The disadvantages include the inefficiency of resource distribution, surplus and shortage. With that being said, loaners cannot perceive consumer favorites, deficiencies, and surpluses with sufficient accuracy and they can’t efficiently coordinate production.

The advantages of the market system determine the winners and losers in each industry based on the demands of the customer, whether industrial, business customers, or consumers, and the people that buy for personal use. If an entrepreneur takes a risk to launch a business putting up capital with the hope that the product or service will succeed, the risk is considered a disadvantage, when the business succeeds, the profit and control of the businesses future is determined by he owner, not the government.

The entrepreneur receives all the benefits without higher authority overruling the earnings, and that achievement makes this an advantage for the market system. The biggest advantage of free market economy is that it gives the people the power of choice. They have greater freedom to choose how they want to spend their income. No matter what, all economies have limitations, as well as the free market. It has no establishment for merit goods like education, housing, and health, making the poor or less likely be deprived of these privileges. This allows the rich to grow richer and the poor to get poorer.

Often this is an issue in the U. S. And it has been an issue since the birth of this country. Also, there’s no provision of the public goods like, street lights, the army, and law enforcement. Free marketers think it’s not profitable to support public goods because public goods consume profit rather than create profit. As for the American free market system compared to the Chinese and North Korean command system, there aren’t many similarities, but there’s an abundant amount of differences. The American way is to give every individual the free right to main personal economic power.

U. S. Government allows the inequality of competition; therefore every man is for themselves. Though this can be a bad system, the government has made it to be the most prosperous in the modern world. Businesses thrive to the fullest under the market system; pinnacles can be reached and exceeded without higher authority taking any to benefit it by spreading the wealth. With the high reward of the market system, there’s a high risk as well. The high risk can be a lack of citizen protection, because law enforcement isn’t supported by the large cash cow of the market system.

Homeland security also can lack employees because the sponsorship by wealthy business owners is not there to support funding. The command system is more reserved than the market economy. There is a lack of high reward, high risk in the economical governments of China and North Korea. Rarely will you see China go through a great depression like the U. S. And rarely will you see North Korea lacking law enforcement employees. The commander of both countries has his hand in every business trade, economic expansion, and sponsorship. Their belief is to spread the wealth, create an equal economic field for all citizens.

There won’t be rich getting richer, if the country is poor, then everyone being spread to everyone, there’s a lack of innovation. Most products under the command system have a lack of quality and the movement in sales is less efficient in comparison to the market system of the United States. There are two types of economies that dominate the modern day world that is command system and market system. Both have good levels of efficiency, the U. S. Have high risk and high reward. The Chinese and Korean has an even spread of earnings making the economic field equal.