Beauty Brings Economic Success

Why Attractive People Are More Successful used this system along with many others to further his study of “philharmonics”, or beauty relationship with economics. In his book, Hammerers explains, “l was not the first to look at the relationship between beauty and economic outcomes, that’s an old topic. I was however, the first to examine it using a nationally representative sample of adults and to do so in the context of economic models of the determination of earnings. “(4) He found that attractive people are typically hired sooner, get promotions more quickly, and are paid more than their less-attractive coworkers.

Studies have shown that beautiful people have the advantage when it comes to landing Job interviews. Recently, Italian researchers from the University of Messing set out to see if physical appearance played a part during the first stage of the hiring process. The researchers sent out over 10,000 of the same resumes while changing only the names, addresses, and photos on each. Ultimately, researchers found that the attractive Job applicants had a significantly higher success rate on callbacks than others.

Specifically, 54% of good-looking ladies received callbacks compared to a measly 7% of not so good-looking ladies. According to Bassett, Portfolio, and Visuals, “Searching for a Job seems to be Just like a beauty contest: it is better for unattractive women to invest on aesthetic surgery than in education. ” (1) However, there are critical factors that play into this beauty bias. One experiment by researchers from Harvard University had participants rate pictures of twenty-five women on competence, likeability, and trustworthiness.

They found that the women wearing keep, shown to enhance attractiveness, received overall higher ratings. Outcome, Stock, Haley, Vickers, and House conclude, “When inferring trustworthiness, likeability, or competence from an image, we are influenced significantly not only by the attractiveness of the inherited phenotype but by the effects of the “extended phenotype,” in this case, makeup. ” (2) While making the decision to hire someone can be difficult, many interviewers rely on their first impressions. Some people look honest, and some look like crooks.

Naturally, those perceived as attractive, competent, sizable, and trustworthy are all the more likely to be chosen tort the Job. Any work environment, beautiful people are prospective candidates for promotion. Catherine Yakima, a professor of sociology at the London School of Economics, and author of the book, Erotic Capital: The Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom even suggests that professional women should use their beauty, sex appeal, charm, dress sense, liveliness, and fitness to get ahead at work.

Yakima elaborates, “Meritocracies are supposed to champion intelligence, qualifications, and experience. But physical and social attractiveness deliver substantial benefits in all social interaction – making a person more persuasive, able to secure the co-operation of colleagues, attract customers and sell products. ” (5) Being that beautiful people have the gift of persuasion, they have a knack for selling more products boosting companies’ total sales. According to David Hammerers, “No company is going to pay you more if you’re good-looking unless it benefits them. (6) Economic researchers at the University of Masochist, in the Netherlands used data from nearly 300 Dutch advertising agencies to test this theory. They found that firms with better-looking executives had definitively higher revenues. Overall productivity, and resulting sales, were greater in companies with more attractive managers, partly because firms with more attractive workers have the competitive advantage when client interactions are involved. Fauna, Fiddled, Hammerers, and Bosnian elucidate, “Executives’ beauty raises firms’ sales; and those increases exceed the likely extra wages that good- looking executives command. (7) The research has proven that while beauty is inked to persuasion and productivity, good-looking employees positively impact company profits and are therefore viewed as valuable and hard working. These employees are certainly more inclined to receive promotions such as manager or executive. In understanding that beauty brings advantages throughout the hiring and promotional process, it should come as no surprise that attractive people make more money during their lifetime. In On the Job, Beauty Is More Than Skin- Deep, Sue Challenger’s of the Wall Street Journal interviews Daniel Hammerers and summarizes his work.

Challenger’s states, “According to his research, attractive people are likely to earn an average of 3% to 4% more than a person with below- average looks. That adds up to $230,000 more over a lifetime for the typical good- looking person, Dry. Hammerers estimates. Even an average-looking worker is likely to make $140,000 more over a lifetime than an ugly worker. ” (8) In Hammerer’s book, Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful, he reveals a fascinating personal story about the direct effects of his research.

On page 62 Hammerers says, As soon as the first beauty study I wrote was made public and drew attention from the media, I began receiving calls from attorneys involved in personal injury cases. ” (4) The initially surprised Hammerers inquired, and what he found was shocking. Using a common injury case whereas a dog bites a child, he explains that many families sue on the argument that the child is left with psychological damages. However, having seen Hammerer’s research, injury attorneys realized that any disfigurement that came from the accident could ultimately lower the now less-good- cooking child’s earnings.

Attorneys asked Hammerers exactly how much the additional loss in lifetime earnings were and wanted it calculated so they could add that to the potential damages they might recover. This occurrence further validates Dry. Hammerers ‘s studies on beauty, and its impact on litter economic success. Researchers have studied the concept of beauty as a factor in a person’s success over and over again, and in multiple ways. All of which have reached the definitive conclusion that beautiful people receive startling but undeniable benefits in this area of life.

There are some obvious occupations in which being beautiful can play a pivotal role, such as acting, modeling, prostitution, and politics. However, many people would be surprised to hear that it effects not only these, but every occupation. Even professors, who presumably should be Judged solely by their ability to teach, are affected by this beauty bias. The popular website, “Rate My Professor”, allows student to rate professors capabilities on helpfulness, clarity, easiness, and hotness. This system insinuates that being hot, affects the overall quality of a professor’s effectiveness.

Leave a Reply