The dual-court system Is the distinction of state and federal courts that make up the judicial branch of the government. A primary factor in maintaining the dual-court system is the sheer cost and the amount of time it would take the Supreme Court to hear and sentence every offense no matter how large or small. Courts are an essential aspect of the criminal Justice system. It is necessary to sustain separate systems, which include police, court, and corrections, locally, at the state level, and dearly, depending on the situation.
All criminal activity requires a Judge’s presence and ruling after the individual has been arrested. It is far more efficient for each of the countless locations, nationwide, to have a municipal court system in place. If there was only one massive police force and corrections organization dealing with a monolithic court system, effectiveness would be minimal. The U. S. Court system Is seen as a fine model for Justice. Many countries have modeled their judiciary process after the U. S. System. We could talk about differences ND similarities all day, but here are a few specific things to note.
Mexico and Japan have s system very similar to the one used in the U. S. Britain has some similarities but they don’t have a court that can declare a law unconstitutional like our Supreme Court can. One thing that really stands out about the United States court system is the rights that are given to the accused. Reading of Miranda Rights is very unique to the United States, and the rights that are guaranteed under those Miranda rights are also very unique. In many countries you may not have the right to a Jury trial or competent legal assistance.
