Accord Fieler’s argument, it’s simple to conclude that some manager shouldn’t change the leadership style because it may cause the low productivity for the manager. As different leadership styles are effective with the suitable situation, when leaders unable to change the leadership style in case of causing low productivity, the only way to achieve the effectiveness is adapt work to management (Dave Hall, 1993).
Another important reason that manager shouldn’t change the leadership style is the number of staff. Image a manager of a public limited company, as there are too many staff then every subordinate respond different leadership style, therefore, it’s impossible for manager to change leadership style to satisfy everyone. The manager in this situation should choose the most productivity leadership style which most subordinates can respond.
Back to the bad situation in organizations that has mentioned before, obviously, autocratic doesn’t suitable for the situation, it is necessary to think about the solutions when organizations meet problems. Some activities must been taken in leaderships. However, it is might be difficult for people to change leadership styles, because the leader may have the force of habit that habit becomes the second nature. So, choose a leader to fit the leadership is necessary and important. An economist who named Fiedler said in 1976: “As a leader is unable to adapt their style to a situation, effectiveness can only be achieved by changing the manger to fit the situation or altering the situation to fit the manger.”
Therefore, companies may tend to change their style of leadership, while the companies facing bad situations. They may think to change the leadership style to adapt their current situation. There have various factors that can influence their decisions. The change of task can be account in it .different properties of task may take different leadership , Dave Hall (1993,BUSINESS STUDIES)said: “The speed of decision needed and action taken may require an authoritarian or autocratic style of leadership.”
On the other hand, it also can be influenced by the culture of the organization. Each company has their own culture and traditions of management system. For example, it is necessary to consult with politicians in public organizations, so that; the leadership style is often democratic (Dave Hall, 1993) .The group size, leaders’ personalities etc. also have been considered as determinable factors.
On the other hand, despite the many evidences which confirm that the leadership style should be adapted to satisfied particular situation and people, there are still some reasons that the manager shouldn’t change the leadership styles. F. Fieler(Fieler,1999,P447)argued that. “It is easier to change someone’s role or power, or to modify the job he has to do, than to change his leadership style.”
Accord Fieler’s argument, it’s simple to conclude that some manager shouldn’t change the leadership style because it may cause the low productivity for the manager. As different leadership styles are effective with the suitable situation, when leaders unable to change the leadership style in case of causing low productivity, the only way to achieve the effectiveness is adapt work to management (Dave Hall, 1993).
